Military action not our only 'big stick'

asked 2019-02-25 06:57:55 -0500

diane253 gravatar image

In the current sea and air territorial spat with our neighbour, Mr Cheng Shoong Tat recommended tit-for-tat action (Time S'pore responded like-for-like to Malaysia; Jan 15). 바카라

Every true Singaporean will be tempted to fan the flames of retaliation and raise the drum beats of conflict, and I am sure many will be on his side.

However, the Government advocates all to keep calm, stay united and resilient.

In other words, do not aggravate the situation. Our MPs are also very anxious about how to advise their constituents.

Should we limit ourselves to reacting in only these two ways?

Theodore Roosevelt was a wise and popular US president, and oft-quoted for his foreign policy methods.

He had one called "big stick diplomacy". 바카라사이트

His policy was to "speak softly and carry a big stick". He used carefully-crafted negotiations with the unspoken threat of American military might.

Singapore's "big stick" need not be military.

It could be economic, social or related to other matters of national development expertise, not forgetting our strong defence cohesiveness, our mighty reserves and honest upright standing in the world.

Furthermore, as long as our cause in the dispute can stand up favourably in international mediation, we have nothing to fear.

edit retag flag offensive close delete