Get the contact of judicial separation lawyer in Chandigarh +919876616815

asked 2018-12-25 09:42:40 -0500

AntjeHindw gravatar image

" This sub-Section came up for interpretation by this Court in Union of India (AIR 1971 SC 2303) the Court held that the non- allocation of marks under various heads in the interview test was illegal but that was because the instructions to the Selection Committee provided that marks were to be awarded at the interview on the basis of five distinct tests. [1] the First Amendment issues involved in the case at bar had to be evaluated within the framework of the statutory and regulatory scheme that had developed over the years, affording great weight to the decisions of Congress and the experience of the Federal Communications Commission, and [2] under the Federal Communications Act and the Commission's "fairness doctrine," broadcast licensees had broad journalistic discretion in the area of discussion of public issues.

best chandigarh legal servicesbest legal service in Chandigarh legal services (c) picsearch.com" style="max-width:400px

edit retag flag offensive close delete