Top Notch Lawyers in Haryana for Employement

asked 2018-12-07 04:15:14 -0600

Some witnesses of the plaintiff stated that Gadadhar Das told them later that he had made wrong statement in those letters for ulterior purposes. It is true that a compromise preliminary decree was passed in the suit. (iii)(Per Gajendmgadkar C. In the present Chandigarh law firms case, Udit Narain, adopted son of Raghu Nandan and the sons of Shyam Narain claimed collectively a half share in the property of the joint family and instituted a suit for that purpose. They are to my mind powerful reasons for rejecting subjective intention as the test in any form.

edit retag flag offensive close delete