Get the contact of family law firm in Chandigarh +919876616815

asked 2018-12-06 04:57:36 -0500

This is demonstrated, it is said, by the fact that the claimants must have been sensitised before the skin prick test revealed that they were, but they continued to do their jobs until the test results were known. The company also argues that it is not, in fact, the sensitisation itself that prevents the claimants from working at their old jobs, but the terms of the collective agreement which led to the employer removing them from risky areas.

edit retag flag offensive close delete