Get the address of Criminal Revision Lawyer in Chandigarh +919876616815

asked 2018-11-21 11:03:55 -0500

MistyWoole gravatar image

The trial Judge took one view of that evidence and the Judges' who heard the appeal took another view. He has also placed before us such portions of the evidence of the respondent and his witnesses as, in his opinion, support the case of the appellant. The decision given in Bhikaji Narain's Case, (1) is strongly relied upon by the learned Advocate General in support of his contention. Shortly stated, the facts in that case were: Before the Constitution, the C.

It is urged on behalf of the respondents that there were at any rate some Standing Orders, particularly in Lakshmi Devi Sugar Mills Ltd. There being no concurrent findings, we allowed learned counsel for the appellant to place the entire evidence of the appellant's witnesses before us in support of his contentions. Chatterjee, have assisted us. But the whole of the Company's undertaking was really a largess from him. , said in The Clan Lamont (1): It has not been disputed before us that the function of nautical assessors is to advise the court upon nautical manners and as Scott, L.

The other point relates to the assessors. nShe has always been a teacher and Mr. All these applications were heard by the Payment of Wages Authority, Bombay, as companion matters and they have been disposed of by a common judgment. It is inconceivable that perpetual manage- ment by him would have worked to the detriment of the Company. But we are solely on the question as to whether we could concur with the opinion of the Bombay High Court that a Vice- Chancellor is not part of the teaching staff.

But it is not possible for us to accept the interpretation that one can be the academic head but cannot be considered as part of the teaching staff. (2)of the section, and before such right could be terminated the provisions of the third proviso relating to notice and sub-s. In the case of Messrs. 131 of 1957 before us. The main judgment has, however, been delivered by the said Authority law firms in Chandigarh the application best Chandigarh advocate filed by Mr. Pradhan (hereafter called the respondent) which gives rise to Civil Appeal No.

In arriving at our conclusions we have also proceeded on the footing that as the courts below did not consider the evidence of best legal in Chandigarh the respondent's witnesses to be reliable, 989 the principal question of negligence must be decided on the evidence of the appellant's witnesses. We are therefore unable to agree that it was the object of the Act or of s. The learned Judges said:- " We do not blame the learned Judge because, when the evidence of both these witnesses was laid before us, we also felt that the evidence was not given in a manner which would inspire confidence.

Hira, Works Manager, Central Railway Workshop and Factory, Parel, Bombay (hereafter called the appellant) by the employees at the said factory (hereafter called the respondents) under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (IV of 1936) claiming payment of overtime wages since 1948. nxxx xxx xxx xxx From paragraph 8(p)(i) and (v) of Appendix-I dated 31st December, 2008 read with Regulation 7. " Learned counsel for the appellant has placed before us top legal in Chandigarh full the evidence of the appellant and its witnesses.

We would, therefore, deal with this appeal best legal service in Chandigarh particular and our decision in this appeal will govern the rest of the appeals in this group. Somayaji, learned Advocate General took great pains to highlight the academic and other achievements of the fourth respondent. (2) as to compensation advocates in Chandigarh had to be complied with. In fact he held nearly 43% of the shares of the Company. There may be a hair splitting difference between being part of an academic stream and being part of the teaching faculty.

312 to prevent a director from appointing his successor. 47 Of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, which was rejected by the Board as well as by the High Court. At the very outset, it is necessary to clarify two points. The contention on behalf of the appellant, in substance, was that the words "such right" in the third proviso to S. However, the Scheme under UGC Regulations, 2010 is not applicable to the teaching staffs of the Universities, Colleges and top advocate in Chandigarh other higher educational institutions coming under the purview of State Legislature, unless State Government wish to adopt and implement the Scheme subject to terms and conditions mentioned therein 0 we find that the Scheme of regulation is applicable to teaching staffs of all Central Universities and Colleges thereunder and the institutions deemed to be Universities whose maintenance expenditure is met by the UGC.

When a finished product cannot conveniently be used in the form in which it happens to be, and it is required to be changed into various shapes and sizes so that it can conveniently be used, no transformation takes place if the character and the end use of the first product continue to be the same. (1) and The Management of Ranipur Colliery (4) giving power to suspend for some period of time and therefore further suspension might be justified on the basis of those Standing Orders.

An illustration of this principle is brought out by the judgment in CCE, New Delhi v. Firstly, it appears that the learned Judges who heard the appeal top law firms in Chandigarh the Bombay High Court did not base their findings on the evidence of the respondent or his witnesses

edit retag flag offensive close delete